Pennsylvania's Clarifying Amendment for Declaratory Judgments
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Reasoning and intuiting the standards for judgments
What is the extension to which the act of reasoning and the standards of judgments are interrelated? The author, proposing Muslim scholars` views in the field and relying on traditions, ahadith, has concluded that firstly one has to answer the question: does the standard and expediency of Divine judgment lies in the judgment or in its object? The latter is signified, however, with view to so...
متن کاملThe prototype as a construct in abnormal psychology: 2. Clarifying disagreement in psychiatric judgments.
This article examines three hypotheses suggested by the concept of a prototype. The first hypothesis is that an observer's impression of a target person depends on the number of prototypic features present in the stimulus description. Study 1 showed that a target person was judged to be more depressed if the case description contained many features of the prototype of a depressed person. The se...
متن کاملMichael Oakeshott’s Declaratory Theory of Adjudication
I this essay I consider a portion of of Chapter Two of Michael Oakeshott’s book, On Human Conduct, in which Oakeshott pursues an understanding of civil association in terms of its conditions or assumptions.1 These postulates include free agents, civil law, adjudication, authority and obligation, legislation, and politics. The portion I consider treats one of these postulates, adjudication. Oake...
متن کاملA Constitutional Amendment for Deworming
In February 2009, The Washington Post reported that three South American countries, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Venezuela, have either launched or completed ambitious efforts to rewrite their constitutions in order to expand the social and economic rights guaranteed to its citizens [2]. For the most part these new charters are considered populist documents, reflecting the leanings of newly elected le...
متن کاملClarifying Utterances
The paper argues for the importance of utterances (as opposed to \sen-tences in context") as basic units in dialogue. The main case study is clar-iication: a characterization is provided within KOS, a recently developed synthesis of situation semantics and dialogue games, of the clariications that can follow up on an utterance. This involves outlining: (a) a theory of understanding for dialogue...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register
سال: 1944
ISSN: 0749-9833
DOI: 10.2307/3333806